|
23-02-2005, 05:17 AM | #1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
DIY Co2 or NutraFin Co2
Hey brozzz,
I have a 48x10x24 uniquarium arcylic tank. 260W PL lighting and no co2 injection. I was debating on whether to buy the Nutrafin Co2 System or make DIY co2 system from a 2 liter bottle. But since I am new to the planting scene I am not sure what is better or more efficient. Any ideas would be appreciated! |
23-02-2005, 05:22 AM | #2 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The good thing about the Nutrafin DIY set is that it incoporates a flipper. Most would agree that a flipper would be the most effective way of dissolving CO2 for DIY CO2.
If you were to purchase a flipper by itself, the Dennerle ones would easier cost 3-4 times more than that of the Nutrafin. Economically speaking, i would opt for the Nutrafin for the DIY way. Quote:
|
|
23-02-2005, 05:28 AM | #3 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
23-02-2005, 05:44 AM | #4 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
this is the nutrafin thingy that we're talking about: http://www.theaquariumshop.co.uk/ish...hopscr355.html this is the flipper http://shop.store.yahoo.com/pet-king/15561176989.html if your tank's measured in cm then it's pretty alrrght to go ahead with diy... but still nutrafin or similar products would be a good choice because of the flipper/diffusor provided. just concoct your own mixture after you used up the ones that came with the set hmmmm but if it';s in cm then won't your lights be extremely overkill? |
|
23-02-2005, 05:47 AM | #5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
btw what sort of plants are you keeping in there? some plants are less co2 hungry.... but with the amount of lights you're shining on your plants(>5wpg) isn;t there a risk of algae attack with inconsistent(diy) co2?
|
23-02-2005, 05:56 AM | #6 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
23-02-2005, 06:26 AM | #7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
one nutrafin is pretty small.. i think for your case perhaps using a huge container might be easier(you do one huge mix instead of many small ones) and more economical... since you're going diy you'll have to come up with a better way of diffusion to fully utilize every precious co2 bubble.... perhaps try doing a diy reactor? this website's pretty good-->here
i'd suggest fixing up a few big bottles and connect them together and link up them to a reactor which has a better diffusion rate compared to the flipper as it sorts of forces your co2 to be dissolved seen the diagram of fixing up several bottles of co2 in series and one output location, think that's a better choice compared to nutafin since the bottles are quite small and thus you've to get many to produce more co2 for a longer time hope it helps |
23-02-2005, 06:49 AM | #8 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
23-02-2005, 06:57 AM | #9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
should be good enough, try adding more yeast to get a better bubbling rate but then your mixture will thus deplete sooner...there're a lot of variations on the net regarding the concoctions... personally i'm using brewers' yeast,milk powder,bicarbonate of soda and tank water to mix up my sugar.
will your sump cause surface agitation? if so co2 will escape from the water(sorry mind;s tired couldn't explain better) |
23-02-2005, 07:06 AM | #10 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|