 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
28-04-2007, 01:04 PM
|
#91 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
should be good ba... gratz bro
|
|
|
28-04-2007, 01:41 PM
|
#92 |
|
Endangered Dragon
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,566
|
can anyone tell me why become red nose?
|
|
|
|
28-04-2007, 03:55 PM
|
#93 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
woo...mecury type accurate anot...
i feel like getting those digital ones leh.. like 7-8 bucks only...the 24 hr shop at c328.... |
|
|
|
28-04-2007, 05:46 PM
|
#94 |
|
Endangered Dragon
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,566
|
acctually mercury is more accurate than digital.. got 1 guy tested digital VS mercury.. mercury seems more accurate... and cheaper also.. only that its not nicer den digital type
|
|
|
|
|
28-04-2007, 06:06 PM
|
#95 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
okok..
good good... like that i go popular see got sell anot... buy those lab ones... 0 - 100 degrees... |
|
|
|
28-04-2007, 06:14 PM
|
#96 |
|
Endangered Dragon
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,566
|
that one i think more expensive.. go C328 buy.. only $1.50 for mercury type... looks nicer also
|
|
|
|
|
28-04-2007, 09:54 PM
|
#97 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
bro digital ones not accurate. i'm using mine now as a clock. sucks man. get the traditional one. much better.
|
|
|
|
28-04-2007, 11:07 PM
|
#98 |
|
Endangered Dragon
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,566
|
yup.. got ppl test.. few digital put in same tank.. different reading on digital are as big as 4C difference.. mercury are much more accruate..
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Linear Mode
